World Heritage Sites, Wilderness Areas, NAIS, World Bank - A Must Read

Derry Brownfield
Aug. 17, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

I consider Wayne Hage one of the most intelligent men I ever met. On
our very first visit he was explaining the World Bank, the
International Monetary fund and how the world bankers planned on
collateralizing the world debt with land. Not just the U.S. national
debt, but the "WORLD" debt. A listener sent me a copy of a report of
the FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONGRESS, which was held in Denver in
1987. Over 1500 people from sixty countries were told that wilderness
lands were to protect the reindeer, the spotted owl and other
endangered species. Ninety percent of the group consisted of
conservationts, ecologists, government and United Nations
bureaucrats. The other ten percent were world banking heavyweights,
such as David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank, London banker
Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, James
Baker, who gave the keynote address. George W. Hunt, an investment
councilor, served as official host and sat in on all the meetings. It
was George Hunt that wrote the report from which I have gleaned much
of my information. During that first three days, the group was told
that the WILDERNESS CONGRESS was about beating the ozone
deterioration and bringing the rain forests back. The following days
were closed to the public. With only the bankers in attendance, the
topics discussed centered around the creation of a "WORLD
CONSERVATION BANK" with collateral being derived from receipt of
wilderness properties throughout the world. This bank would have
central bank powers similar to the Federal Reserve. It would create
currency and loans and engage in international discounting, counter-
trade, barter and swap actions. Rothschild personally conducted the
monetary matters and the creation of this WORLD CONSERVATION BANK.
This bank would refinance by swapping debt for assets. A country with
a huge national debt would receive money to pay off the debt by
swapping the debt for wilderness lands. The plan was to swap one
trillion dollars of the Third World Debt into this new bank. In the
long term, when the countries won't be able to pay off the loans,
governments from around the world will give title to their wilderness
lands to the bankers.

George Hunt wrote: "Title to the lands will go to the World
Wilderness Land Inventory Trust. This Trust will float into the World
Conservation Bank by the unanimous decree of the world's people,
saying, God bless you for saving our reindeer. Those people at the
congress were ignorant. I'm talking about the 90% that were not the
world banking heavyweights."

Hunt goes on to say that World Bank loans, as they stand now, arenot
collateralized. They're saying, we want collateral, so when we loan-
swap this debt, we're going to own the Amazon if you default. They're
going to make their bad loans good by collateralizing them after the
fact with all of this land and somebody is going to end up with title
to twelve and a half billion acres. They have multi-trillions of
dollars upon which they can create currencies and loans and they're
going to begin to barter and counter-trade and loan-swap against the
United States. The World Conservation Bank is a scheme to monetize
land. This will function as a world central bank and out of that bank
there will grow a one-world fiat currency.

This isn't some scheme conjured up during the Bush's and Clinton
administrations. The United Nations World Commission on Environment
and Development was created in 1982. The commission published
the "BRUNDTLAND REPORT" setting the stage for unlimited enactments to
take over ecology, environmental and polllution laws throughout the
world. The report stated: "We will have a proposal for very harsh,
quasi-spiritual ecological laws for MOTHER EARTH. A MOTHER EARTH
COMES FIRST mentality will arise throughout the world."

When James Baker made his keynote speech in 1987, he stated that, "No
longer will the World Bank carry this debt unsecured. The only assets
we have to collateralize are federal lands and national parks."
Baker's definition of federal lands includes Heritage sites, of which
there are about 20 in the United States. I say "about" 20, because
they are being added on a regular basis. As I write this article
Congress is about to vote on a proposed Rim of the Valley National
Park that would include over 500,000 acres of National Forest land
and 170,000 parcels of PRIVATE property including many farms and
ranches. At the same time there is a bill before Congress called the
Northern Rockies Ecosytem Protection Act that would increase the
acreage of designated wilderness by 50% in the lower 48 states.

While our Heritage sites take in quite a large amount of territory,
such as Yellowstone National Park and Mesa Verde, the Grand Canyon
and the Everglades, other countries have much greater areas. Brazil
for example has the Amazon Conservation Complex and Canada has the
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks. As I write this story, the list
includes 851 properties in 141 countries, comprising over one third
of the earth's land mass. Will all this land collateralize the
world's debt? Probably not, so along come NAIS (the National Animal
Identification System).

According to the United States Department of Agriculture, "The first
step in implementing a national animal identification system (NAIS)
is identifying and registering premises that are associated with the
animal agriculture industry. In terms of the NAIS, a premise is any
geographically unique location in which agricultural animals are
raised, held, or boarded. Under this definition, farms, ranches, feed-
yards, auction barns and livestock exhibitions and fair sites are all
examples of premises." That may be the definition some government
bureaucrat will give you, but the word "premises" under
the "International Criminal Court Act 2002-Sect. 4", states: The
word "premises" includes a place and a "conveyance." Why check with
the International Criminal Court Act? Because on June 8, 2007 under
Secy. of Ag. Bruce Knight, speaking at the World Pork Expo in Des
Moines, is quoted as saying, "We have to live by the same
international rules we're expecting other people to do."

Throughout the entire Draft National Animal Identification System
Users Guide, land is referred to as a PREMISES and not property.
A "Premises" has no protection under the Constitution of the United
States, while property always has the exclusive rights of the owner
tied to it. Property rights are protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments of the Constitution.

The word "Premise" is a synonym for the word tenement. A definition
of the word tenement in law is: Property, such as land, held by one
person "leasing" it to another. Webster's New World Dictionary 1960
College Edition defines "Premises" as the part of a deed or "lease"
that states its reasons, the parties involved and the property
in "conveyance." Webster then defines "conveyance" as the transfer of
ownership of real property from one person to another. It is quite
obvious that the bureaucrats in Washington had a very good reason to
use the term "premises" and never mention "PROPERTY".

Let's take another look at the wilderness areas and the World Bank's
plans to collateralize its loans. While the wilderness areas cover
about one third of the earth's surface, they are wilderness areas for
a good reason - they are useless or difficult to homestead, farm or
use in a constructive manner. Worldwide, the best and more valuable
land is occupied by farmers, ranchers and people with the ambition to
produce. Wouldn't the World Bankers rather have some productive
property than mountains, deserts and swamps?

I am convinced that the word "premise" will put an encumberance on
your deed. The bankers say they want to monetize land. It's your land
and my land they want to monetize.

The bankers are in the process of accumulating the wealth of the
world. Very few privately owned assets can be termed "real wealth."
According to scripture, God made Abraham very wealthy, giving him
LAND, CATTLE, silver and gold. I don't know where the world deposits
of gold are stored, but I'm sure the bankers have them in their
control. That only leaves LAND and CATTLE which I believe could be
next on the list. Genesis 47 describes how Joseph had storehouses
full of grain to feed the people but he didn't have a welfare
program. During the first year of the famine, Joseph took "ALL THE
MONEY" the people had for only one year's supply of grain. The second
year he took all their cattle for another year's supply of grain. The
next year they said, "We have nothing left but our bodies and our
land. Buy us and our land in exchange for food and we and our land
will be servants to Pharaoh." Gen. 47:21 states, "And as for the
people, he removed them to the cities and made slaves of them."

James Madison made a statement concerning how our people could lose
our freedom by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power. Is
it possible that those in power today are gradually and silently in
the process of removing the people to the cities to make slaves of
them? Federalizing our land and our cattle would certainly be a step
in that direction.

2007 Derry Brownfield - All Rights Reserved

We just want to add to this that leaders in the fight against the
NAIS have tracked back the 15-digit ISO number that is going on our
animals to a section in the ISO documents under FINANCE - effectively
turning our "real wealth" (animals) into CURRENCY that is now under
the control of the INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. And this was discovered
long before we heard about collateralizing of our lands in the above
article, verifying what they are saying in the article IS TRUE.