BORN IN THE USA?
Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prezMajor victory for Army warrior questioning Obama's birthplace
Posted: July 14, 20099:53 pm Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling and Joe Kovacs© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Dr. Orly Taitz
A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida scheduled to report for deployment to Afghanistan within days has had his military orders revoked after arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.
His attorney, Orly Taitz, confirmed to WND the military has rescinded his impending deployment orders.
"We won! We won before we even arrived," she said with excitement. "It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate – and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!"
She continued, "They just said, 'Order revoked.' No explanation. No reasons – just revoked." ...
Title click for story. This will blow you mind.
Otero Residents Forum
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Bomb shell is right. What is up with this?
Pick up the phone and dial 800-828-0498
This message ceceived from Marcia today. You can save a dime by using the toll free number in the title. Here is a little challenge. See how many senator's offices you can get transferred to and report to us. We have a prize for the highest number - a clear conscience. Combining totally separate issues in the same bill is outrageous!
URGENT-Call Senators Bingaman and Udall
Tell them-VOTE NO on S.909
We first wrote to you about this legislation on April 20th. Unfortunately, it has already passed the House. This is out last opportunity to stop this affront to our 1st amendment rights! A vote is expected on this bill this week. Call today!
Because there is insufficient support for it as a stand alone bill, S. 909 (Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Bill) is being attached as an amendment to S. 1390, the National Defense Authorization Act.
By hiding this hate crime bill as an amendment to Pentagon spending, moderate Democrats (and all but 2 Republicans) are faced with a difficult choice: either pass this bill protecting pedophilia and numerous other sexual deviancies or stop funding our troops. We must require S. 909 to be voted on as a stand alone bill.
Please call our NM senators listed below and tell them:
Remove S. 909 as an amendment to S. 1390-pentagon funding for troops
DO NOT pass S. 909 as an amendment to S. 1390, take a stand and vote NO on S. 1390 to prevent its passage if it is NOT removed as an amendment
S. 909 grants extra rights and protection based on sexual orientation and gender identity, this is unfair and unnecessary
S. 909 will permit investigation and prosecution of religious leaders, especially clergy, for speaking Biblical truths on issues such as homosexuality, a clear violation of the 1st Amendment
Jeff Bingaman D-NM 202-224-5521
Tom Udall D- NM 202-224-6621
If time permits, please call the 17 undecided senators below, urging them to do the same.
Blanche Lincoln D-AR 202-224-4843
Byron L. Dorgan D-ND 202-224-2551
Herb Kohl D-WI 202-224-5653
James Webb D-VA 202-224-4024
Jon Tester D-MT 202-224-2644
Kay Hagan D-NC 202-224-6342
Kent Conrad D-ND 202-224-2043
Mark Pryor D-AR 202-224-2353
Mark Warner D-VA 202-224-2023
Max Baucus D-MT 202-224-2651
Michael Bennet D-CO 202-224-5852
Robert C. Byrd D-WV 202-224-3954
Russ Feingold D-WI 202-224-5323
Ted Kaufman D-DE 202-224-5042
Thomas Carper D-DE 202-224-2441Al Franken D-MN 202-224-5641Olympia Snowe R-ME 202-224-5344
Susan Collins R-ME 202-224-2523
Thank you for your commitment to the protection of life, marriage, families and religious freedom.
Sincerely,
TVAC-NM
The Traditional Values Action Committee-NM
PROMISES, PROMISES: Indian health care's victims
CROW AGENCY, Mont. – Ta'Shon Rain Little Light, a happy little girl who loved to dance and dress up in traditional American Indian clothes, had stopped eating and walking. She complained constantly to her mother that her stomach hurt.
Title click for complete, heartbreaking story. A preview of what our new healthcare system will look like.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Reduced Immigration = Reduced Carbon Emissions
New FAIR Report Shows Reducing Immigration Would Lower Carbon Emissions
A new report released last week by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) shows that immigration-fueled population growth has been the single largest contributing factor to the increase in U.S. energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions over the past 35 years....
Click on title for full report.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Two More Obama Czars Accountable to No One but "Himself"
"John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet...." Read direct quotes from his book not taken out of context:
http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
"When it comes to the First Amendment, Team Obama believes in Global Chilling.
Cass Sunstein, a Harvard Law professor who has been appointed to a shadowy post that will grant him powers that are merely mind-boggling, explicitly supports using the courts to impose a "chilling effect" on speech that might hurt someone's feelings. He thinks that the bloggers have been rampaging out of control and that new laws need to be written to corral them..."
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07112009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/gag_the_internet__178749.htm?page=0
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
A Private and a Public Meeting with Congressman Teague
Subject: Re: HARRY TEAGUE'S VISIT 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM - THURSDAY, JULY 2ND., 2009 - COUNTY ADMIN BLDG.
My family and I were granted about a 2-3 minute audience with Congressman Teague yesterday. In response to my question of how he could have possibly voted for the "Cap & Trade" bill that would increase taxes on us all, and cripple this economy he stated, and I paraphrase..."When I got to Washington I thought we would actually have debates on things like global warming...but that train has left the station 4-5 years ago and I could have wasted my vote trying to turn it back. I voted for it because I got some concessions for New Mexico's small oil and gas producers." I asked him what ever happened to standing on principle. I reminded him that this disasterous bill only passed by 6-7 votes and if a few more representatives along with himself had stood on principle this bill could have been defeated. He had no response..he only stared at us without saying a word. I left with a request that he read the 10th Amendment to the Constitution before he votes on anything else.
AMENDMENT X
POWERS RETAINED BY THE STATES AND THE PEOPLE
The powers not relegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Subject: Re: HARRY TEAGUE'S VISIT 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM - THURSDAY, JULY 2ND., 2009 - COUNTY ADMIN BLDG.
Hi Folk's. Just a short note to let those of you who couldn't make it to the "Meet & Greet" what a joke it was. Due to traffic conditions on the Mtn, ( Rock Clearance at Bailey Cyn) I arrived at 5 mins to 1:00 pm, ( expecting to be turned away). Surprisingly, Teague's aid allowed me to stand at the end of the line( 4-5 remaining people). Everyone in front of me was "T-ed Off" and grumbling about "Cap & Trade" and Health Care . Each person was allowed 1 min. to talk to Mr. Teague, ( wow how nice ).
When it came to me, I simply told him I felt strongly that he screwed up by voting for the Cap & Trade Bill' without reading it and reminded him of his conversation with my wife when he visited Cloudcroft a couple of months ago. When she asked him about Cap & Trade" he replied "I don't even want to got there it gives me heart burn". ( So he voted for it anyhow?) I also advised him that my wife & I would be really working hard to defeat him when his term was up. He just stood there with a blank expression on his face and never responded.
As I was sitting in my car outside the Co. Office Bldg, He and his "Flunky" exited the Bldg and I noticed they were Talking & laughing Broadly with each other. Apparently he wasn't all that bothered by the citizen responses to his "Meet & Greet"!! I venture to guess Steve Pearce would not have acted in that manner.
My take on Teague is he is a one issue guy, ( Veterans Affairs) which is an easy one to make him look good for his constituents. Do not get me wrong, I support our Vets whole heartedly, and realize they need all the help they can get when dealing with the V.A.. I just have the impression Teague is a "One Trick Pony".
Regards,
Mayhill, NM.
PS Hope to see you all at the "Tea Party" at the Cloud Country Party Barn on JUly 4th at 12:00pm. Guest Speaker State Rep. Nora Espinosa!!
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Out of Al Gore's Mouth: Global Governance and Global Treaties are the solution to Global Warming
Click title to hear the snake oil saleman's own words on July 7, 2009, Oxford, England.
Monday, July 6, 2009
Illegal Immigration Effects Energy Consumption - Good News for Cap and Trade Advocates
Sunday, July 5, 2009
KneeCap and Trade Vote Challenged by Constituents
kneecap definition ...knee·cap (-kap′)...transitive verb kneecapped -·capped′, kneecapping -·cap′·ping; to maim by shooting or drilling the kneecap, often as an act of terrorism
http://www.yourdictionary.com/kneecap
Well, the offsets hit the fan in Alamogordo Thursday, 7/2/09. See "Teague Opens Office" http://www.alamogordonews.com/ci_12745330 and the photo on page 6 http://alamogordonews.mycapture.com/mycapture/enlarge.asp?image=24510710&event=790137&CategoryID=19239 showing analysis of Cap and Trade's effects on Americans and the economy.
For documentation purposes, this ADN article did not report that there was a considerable dust up at the meeting. Congressman Teague gave a short welcome telling attendees of his new office in the Otero County Administration Building. He then left the commission chambers and a staffer told the assembled that Teague would take citizen questions privately in his office.
This ducking did not set well with some citizens who pointed out that the meeting was publically announced and they wanted their concerns heard by everyone there. After several "back and forths" by staffers to his new office, Teague relented, came back to the chambers and took some questions before taking the "private concerns".
Apparently, a similar fiasco occurred in Roswell the day before. If it didn't work in Roswell, why did Harry think it would work here?
NRCC hammers Teague over cap-and-trade vote Posted 7/02/2009 09:00:00 AM
"...It’s already getting a bit contentious. Democracy for New Mexico has the scoop on a group of people who showed up at a Teague event in Roswell and booed him when he said he thought most of his constituents also would have voted for the energy bill. And it degraded from there…"
http://haussamen.blogspot.com/
On Saturday, 7/04/2009 ADN published "Teague explains cap-and-trade vote" http://www.alamogordonews.com/ci_12750866 ADN also published am Editorial the same day:
Carbon bill unlikely to deliver promised jobs
"President Barack Obama is chiding critics of his carbon cap-and-trade proposal to combat global warming for being afraid of a future shaped by new energy technologies and thriving with so-called green jobs.
What those skeptics are really afraid of is a future locked to laws that institutionalize high unemployment, low growth and a lesser standard of living for Americans.
The administration and Democratic leaders in the House are banking passage of cap-and-trade legislation on the promise that the government's $100 billion investment in green technologies will spin off 5 million new jobs and hyper-boost the economy.
It's a tough sell, even to the administration's congressional supporters.
The House just narrowly passed the measure, with many nervous Democrats deserting their leaders to join Republicans in opposition. That spells trouble for the bill in the Senate, where bipartisan concerns about the impact on the economy are being raised.
Before the country commits to such a radical change, the promises made by supporters must be more carefully examined.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says her advocacy for cap-and-trade is all about "jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs." But there's no evidence that employment has grown anywhere in the world because of energy mandates such as cap-and-trade.
A study released in March by four professors hosted by the University of Illinois casts a great deal of doubt about green job creation.
The academics found claims of green jobs to be unsubstantiated or overstated, and that energy mandates will likely kill more jobs in other industries than they create.
The report also warns that strict government demands for renewable energy sources — the cap-and-trade bill requires 20 percent of energy production be from renewables — and bans on more plentiful and reliable sources such as coal will choke off growth and risk leaving the country in the dark.
There's also considerable disagreement about the cost of the cap-and-trade bill.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates it to be a mere $175 a household. But the conservative Heritage Foundation pegs it at $3,000 per household, which seems more realistic considering the impact on energy and fuel prices.
This is not a job creation bill and it won't revive the economy.
It's a bill, according to the professors, that would "lead to restructuring and possibly impoverishing our society." Senators should acknowledge that possibility before casting their vote.
Reprinted from The Detroit News and released through Creators Syndicate.
http://www.creators.com/opinion/daily-editorials/cap-and-trade-bill-unlikely-to-deliver-promised-jobs.html
Creators.com is a cool website chocked full of opinion and commentary.
Below in another post is a list of links about alleged corruption, charges made and high jinks of trading carbon units that has been in play for years. It is a wealth of information for those concerned with those pesky facts.
Stop and think about it. Where is the common sense? In an example used, your dog has flatulence. You feel guilty. You relieve your guilt by contributing $200 to Clean Dog Conservancy. Your dog will still have flatulence and the Clean Dog Conservancy will take your money and turn it into advertising and fund raising dollars to help support the campaigns of elected "representatives" who have agendas other than their constituents. Step off the merry-go-round and take a closer look. JW
Friday, July 3, 2009
HOW THE CARBON FAIRY WORKS HER MAGIC: CARBON OFFSETS EXPLAINED
Title click to be taken to links and articles explaining how this deal works. OR call Harry Teague at
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, CARBON OFFSETS AND ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD
Title click to read about the FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION'S investigation into allegations of carbon offset fraud and articles exposing carbon offsets as fraud, both in the U.S. and Europe.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
LINK TO CAP & TRADE OPPOSITION
Title click to be taken to a link with a few key oppostion articles and links to pdf files explaining the scam, damage, jobless and cost to U.S. taxpayers from the American Clean Energy and Security Act, aka: CAP & TRADE.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Congressman Teague Voted for Cap and Trade
Need I say more?
2010 Census
The Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution) at the Fourth Amendment reads:
Amendment IV
Search and arrest warrants
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The provisions of Title 13 requiring information other than the number of persons, ages and sexes are in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, no other information need be given. If people will just remember that Title 13 violates the fourth amendment then that is all they need to say when asked for anything other than number, age and sex. See below legal authority citing cases, interesting commentary by Dr. Laurie Roth and a quotation worth repeating. Janet
"Subject: [jbs-26] The Census - give limited information; instructions; rights
FYI - read carefully and decide how you'll answer the intrusive US Census (which has already sent workers around to determined the GPS coordinates for your home.)
Amanda
________________________________________________________________
Original message:
Subject: Acorns Illegal Census; Constitutional Requirements
Action: Print this and pass along.
Legal Authority to Ask Intrusive Questions Not Present
This Constitution and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof... shall be the supreme Law of the Land...all Judges shall be bound thereby...any Thing...to the Contrary notwithstanding.[Article VI, Clause 2, of the Constitution of the United States of America (1789)]
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void. Unconstitutional law bears no power to enforce, it purports to settle as if it never existed, for unconstitutionality dates from the enactment of such a law and not such time as branded in an open court of law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. No courts are bound to uphold it and no persons are bound to obey it.[16 Am Jur 256]
The Fourth and Fifth Amendments were described in Boyd v. United States , 116U.S. 616, 630, as protection against all governmental invasions ....of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life. We recently referred[381 U.S. 479, 485] in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 656, to the Fourth Amendment as creating a ....right to privacy, no less important than anyother right carefully and particularly reserved to the people.''[GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT , 381 U.S. 479 (1965)]
Declaration To Make To Census Takers:"I hereby affirm that the provisions of Title 13 ....requiring me to disclose my race, personal financial data, birth date, or any other personal, private information to the Bureau of the Census, an agency of the United States government, constitutes an unreasonable, unwarranted search of my person, house, papers, and/or effects, and a governmental invasion of the sanctity of my home and the privacies of life. As such, these provisions violate the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, and are thus wholly void and I am not bound to obey them. I have completed the only those sections of the Census form pertaining to the Constitutionally-mandated actual enumeration, as follows:
1. The actual number of people living at the address printed on the form,excluding untaxed Native Americans;
2. Age of each person in accordance with US Const. Amendment XIV, Section 2;
3. Sex of each person, in accordance with US Const. Amendment XIV, Section 2.
I have thus fulfilled my obligation to the attainment of the actual enumeration of the populace of the United States.. Any fine or other sanction that is levied by any office or organization
stemming from the unconstitutional provisions of Title 13 in connection with my response to this or any other Census-related questioning will be challenged in a court of law.
________________________________________________________________________ Article source: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12338
Census bureau, ACORN, How safe is the information?
Put a lock on your underwear drawer…the census questions are coming.
By Dr. Laurie Roth Thursday, June 25, 2009
Bull's-eye central is afoot. The thousands of volunteer census workers assigned to get answers to questions from every household in the country has launched. How old are you and members of your household? What is your religion? Have you ever been on food stamps? What is your phone number? What is your race?
Magically we have ACORN as one of the groups at the center of collecting data nationally. Don't you just want a stranger from ACORN coming to your door, saying you have to answer personal, intrusive and unconstitutional questions for the first time in our census history? According to Representative Michele Bachmann, she has stated publicly:
"I know for my family the only question we will be answering is how many people are in our home. We won't be answering any information beyond that, because the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that."
Census bureau spokesperson Shelly Lowe didn't waste any time taking Bachmannto the woodshed by reminding her of a portion of the U.S. legal code sayingthat if anyone over 18 refuses to answer any of the questions asked by census takers you can be fined up to $5,000.
Of course, predictably, the left and census brains are implying Bachmann is above the law and any of the rest of us who might rebel by not answering intrusive questions are horribly in error and will be fined if not more consequences.
We collect census info every 10 years and it is in our constitution that we do need to reveal how many people live at our home. That is for good reason since money is allocated to various states and members are elected to officeby knowing how many people need representation in various areas around thecountry.
All manipulative and personal questions are a violation of our rights and frankly none of our Government's business. When money and potential, political representation is linked to the outcome of census numbers collected we should have all the more concern that a group like ACORN, full of indictments in over a dozen states for fraud and misrepresentation iseven involved!
The question we all should have is what is the Government planning to dowith all this personal info?
Could our personal info be ever used against us? According to Rep. Bachmann
some of the members of congress have had their web sites hacked into. How will all our private information be protected, not sold, not stolen and not used against us at some time?
The census folks and this administration say abuse of the info won't happenand we are safe. Are we safe much like the Japanese were in the 40s underFranklin Roosevelt who USED CENSUS RECORDS TO ROUND UP ALL THE JAPANESE AND PUT THEM IN INTERNMENT CAMPS. No, our Government wouldn't dream of over reaching with control and abuse on the American people.
I encourage all to think very carefully about what your rights are and whatyou should do in answering questions that are vividly unconstitutional!
With a Government that wants more and more control and already identifies masses of law abiding citizens and vets as potential domestic terrorists we must start drawing lines!!! We must draw lines of protest regarding this fraudulent over reach regarding the census; draw lines regarding intrusionon private enterprise and business, draw lines regarding loan shark like plans for additional taxes, via cap and trade, the endlessly growing stimulus bill, and potential UN, global taxation schemes a foot as we speak.We don't have a choice anymore. Those of us who want a country left mustfind our voice, really read and know our constitution, declaration of Independence and bill of rights!!! Once these truth's and foundations are inour heads, organize, march, protest where needed and get behind real publicservants!!! God bless America and our right to privacy!!!
Friday, June 26, 2009
WASHINGTON TIMES: CONYERS BACKS OFF PROBE OF ACORN
Title click to read this article on the WASHINGTON TIMES website.
"House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. has backed off his plan to investigate purported wrongdoing by the liberal activist group ACORN, saying ?powers that be? put the kibosh on the idea.
Mr. Conyers, Michigan Democrat, earlier bucked his party leaders by calling for hearings on accusations the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) has committed crimes ranging from voter fraud to a mob-style "protection" racket."
CALL HARRY TEAGUE AND TELL HIM TO VOTE NO ON CAP AND TRADE
H.R. 2454, the AMERICAN CLEAN ENERGY AND SECURITY ACT is being voted on today in the House of Representatives in D.C. today. This sham enivornmental /security act is actually a global agreement to market many foreign cooperations in the U.S. by implementing H.R 2454 which will raise your utility bills an average of $1600 a year. Essentially, we are fining the American public, much like the language in the Kyoto Treaty, and re-distributing your 'wealth' to finance a green corporate initiative directed by global corporate green mongers.
MANKATO FREE PRESS LIKES AMERICAN CLEAN ENERGY AND SECURITY ACT
Title click to read this article on the MANKATO FREE PRESS website.
REUTERS: H.R. 2454 AMERICAN CLEAN ENERGY AND SECURITY ACT
Title click to read article on the REUTERS website.
BLOOMBERG: CAP AND TRADE
Title click to read this article on BLOOMBERG website.
"Critics, including billionaire investor Warren Buffett, head of Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway Inc., say the plan would increase the price of energy.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President Bruce Josten urged lawmakers to vote against it because he said it wouldn’t ensure development of enough renewable energy sources to make up for the required reduction in fossil-fuel emissions.
“Instead, it would impose 397 new regulations and 1,060 new mandates on the American public,” Josten wrote in a letter sent yesterday.
‘Ridiculous Tax’
House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio called the legislation “job killing” and said it would “punish” Americans with a “ridiculous tax.”
Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the second-ranking House Republican, called the measure a “national energy tax” on households and small businesses. The measure would lead to “the loss of millions of jobs,” he said."
HARSANYI: HOW TO LIE WITH STATISTICS
Title click to read op-ed piece on the DENVER POST website.
Denver Post Editorial: CAP AND TRADE IS WRONG
Title click to read this editorial on the DENVER POST website.
"It would do so by creating a new market, where essentially shares of carbon allowances could be bought and sold. A power plant that needed more allowances could buy them from another that had reduced its carbon emissions. Over time, the number of allowances would shrink, forcing reductions of CO2.
Critics say such a market could be gamed by powerful interests and also would be susceptible to fraud.
Some environmentalists say a simple tax on emissions would be a far simpler way to discourage polluters and encourage green energy innovations. Such a "carbon tax" could be increased over time to spur our nation's weaning from fossil fuels. We see merit in that approach.
Another problem with Waxman- Markey is that the analysis keeps changing. An early estimate by theCongressional Budget Office suggested the cost to families could be about $1,600 a year as the ratcheting down of credits to industry intensified."
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
OBAMA'S GREEN ENERGY INCLUDES $18.5B FOR NUCLEAR PLANTS
Title click to read article on INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES website.
OBAMA: HOPE, CHANGE, TRANSPARENCY....RIGHT...
Saturday, June 20, 2009
WILL YOU GIVE YOUR INFORMATION TO ACORN?
Title click to read article on ROTTEN ACORN website.
"ACORN returned to the national spotlight during the 2008 election when its employees turned in fraudulent voter registration files, including listing the Dallas Cowboys’ starting lineup as voters in Nevada. This blatant attempt at fraud led authorities to raid ACORN’s offices in the state. Not to be outdone, ACORN canvassers in Florida actually attempted to turn in forms registering Mickey Mouse as a voter. And ACORN managed to register a seven-year old girl to vote in Connecticut. The list goes on.
Nation-wide investigations into ACORN’s role in voter fraud have yielded dozens of indictments. Nevada recently charged ACORN with 26 counts of voter registration fraud and 13 counts of illegally compensating canvassers. In Pennsylvania, seven Pittsburgh-area ACORN employees were charged with falsifying voter registration forms. Six of them were accused of doing so to meet an illegal quota system."
More from ROTTEN ACORN 'The list goes on' link:
NM 2008 Prosecutors are investigating more than 1,100 ACORN-submitted voter registration cards after a county clerk found them to be fraudulent. Many of the cards included duplicate names and slightly altered personal information.
2005 Four ACORN employees submitted as many as 3,000 potentially fraudulent signatures on the group’s Albuquerque ballot initiative. A local sheriff added: “It’s safe to say the forgery was widespread.”
2004 An ACORN employee registered a 13-year-old boy to vote. Citing this and other examples, New Mexico State Representative Joe Thompson stated that ACORN was “manufacturing voters” throughout New Mexico. 2004 A Florida Department of Law Enforcement spokesman said ACORN was “singled out” among suspected voter registration groups for a 2004 wage initiative because it was “the common thread” in the agency’s fraud investigations.
Read a report on ACORN's corruption and fraud:
http://rottenacorn.com/downloads/060728_badSeed.pdf
***************************
ORF says there is on going concern about non-profit community organizations like ACORN conducting the 2010 census.
ORF has provided the Otero County Commissioners with a suggested county ordinance:
WASHINGTON TIMES: EXCLUSIVE: MINN LAWMAKER VOWS NOT TO FILL OUT CENSUS
Title click to read this article on the WASHINGTON TIMES website.
Mrs. Bachmann said she's worried about the involvement of ACORN, the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now, in next year's census.
TWT RELATED STORIES:
• Lawmakers attack Fed's expanded role
• Democrats urged to play up 'clean' energy
• Partisan splits show in health care debate
• Sen. Boxer to officer: Don't call me ma'am
"They will be in charge of going door to door and collecting data from the American public," she said. "This is very concerning."
ACORN has applied to help recruit workers to help conduct the census. Republican lawmakers and some public interest groups have expressed concern over their involvement.
ACORN staffers have ben indicted in several states on charges of voter registration fraud stemming from the organization's efforts to register voters last year.
************************************************************************************************************************
ORF says there is on going concern about non-profit community organizations like ACORN conducting the 2010 census.
ORF has provided the Otero County Commissioners with a suggested county ordinance:
Friday, June 19, 2009
HOME GARDENERS AND SELLERS AT FARMERS MARKET COULD BE FINED $100,000 UNDER H.R.2749
Title click to read about H.R. 2749 on the CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY website.
* HR 2749 creates severe criminal and civil penalties, including prison terms of up to 10 years and/or fines of up to $100,000 for each violation for individuals.
OPERATION SAVE AMERICA: REASONS TO OPPOSE HATE CRIMES BILL
Title click to read article on OPERATION SAVE AMERICA website.
"If a local prosecutor becomes aware that the assailant was opposed to homosexuality, he could say that the attacker's "perception" contributed to the motivation for the attack. Once he makes that assertion, he can appeal for special prosecutorial involvement from the federal government.
Thomas Jefferson declared, "The legislative powers of government reach to actions only--not to opinions." On this basis alone, S. 909 should be rejected by the Senate. It clearly includes opinions, thoughts, and beliefs in the punishment of the act."
TELL UDALL TO VOTE NO ON S.909 DUBBED THE PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT
Title click to read specifics of this controversial bill on WORLDNET DAILEY.COM.
CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ACORN RAISE CONCERNS
Title click to read article on CNS.COM website.
ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is among 281 non-profit groups and 111 corporations that have signed partnership agreements with the Census Bureau as of April 13. Those partners will help provide 1.4 million workers to conduct door-to-door operations. (See Partner List)
ORF SUGGEST NEW COUNTY ORDINANCE REGISTERING FOREIGN CENSUS TAKERS IN OTERO COUNTY
NEW TAXES ON HOUSE AGENDA...NEW TAXES...NEW TAXES...
Title click to read article...@#$%!!!
JON VOIGHT IN THE CROSS HAIRS FOR 'FALSE PROPHET' REMARK
Title click to read article on WASHINGTON TIMES website.
S. 379 & H.R. 848 COULD DESTROY LOCAL RADIO STATIONS
Title click to read about the PERFORMANCE RIGHTS ACT.
Learn More & Join the Fight
For generations, Americans have loved listening to their favorite radio station. In addition to playing music, radio stations offer valued services to the local community such as emergency alerts about weather or natural disasters, raise money for charities, and sponsor local community events.
However, the major record companies want local radio stations to pay for the music we provide to listeners like yourself free of charge.
They are spending millions lobbying Congress to pass legislation that would establish a performance tax for music played over the radio. These bills, S. 379 & H.R. 848 would devastate local radio stations across the country. However, even more importantly, the bills would negatively impact communities and local listeners.
CALL HER SENATOR ASSHAT NEXT TIME
Title click to read article on the WASHINGTON TIMES website.
"Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh of the Army Corps of Engineers had addressed male senators on the Environment and Public Works Committee as "sir" during the Tuesday hearing. When the time came to speak with Mrs. Boxer, the panel's chairwoman, he called her "ma'am."
Mrs. Boxer quickly interrupted him.
"Do me a favor, can you say 'senator' instead of 'ma'am'?" Mrs. Boxer pointedly asked the general. "It's just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title, so I'd appreciate it. Thank you."
STATES & DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GO AFTER MAIL ORDER, RESERVATION CIGARETTE PURCHASES
Title click to read article on the WASHINGTON TIMES website.
"Gladys Kramer, 82, of Butler township in Pennsylvania, is one of those smokers. She has a lien against her home to recover $4,583 in unpaid state cigarette taxes and fees. Ms. Kramer bought cigarettes by telephone from a Seneca smoke shop in New York and said the state never told her that she owed money before it sent the lien.
"It's the most asinine thing I've ever heard," Ms. Kramer said. "I don't really object to the taxes. I object to them pulling this fast one, and now I have to pay interest on the tax because I didn't know about it."
Ms. Kramer said she never received a mailed notice.
"I'm asking from now on," she said. "
