Title click to view the entire list on the STIMULUS WATCH website.
Posts and Comments from Readers
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
STIMULUS WATCH: STIMULUS PACKAGE PROJECTS FOR NEW MEXICO
Sunday, February 22, 2009
PREDATOR CONTROL: CATTLEMEN REJECT PETITION TO BAN PREDATOR CONTROL TOOLS
R L provided ORF with this article and the link to the website. Title click to read the entire article.
Cattlemen’s Capitol Concerns: Predator Control, USDA Beef Statistics, Western Range Summit
PLC Applauds Rejection of Petition to Ban Predator Control Tools
The Public Lands Council (PLC) and National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) are pleased with the decision by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to deny a petition for suspension and cancellation of M-44 Sodium Cyanide Capsules & Sodium Fluroroacetate (Compound 1080) Livestock Protection Collars (LPC).
Annually, cattle and sheep industry losses to predation are estimated to be $18.3 million and $51 million respectively and in the absence of effective predation management tools these numbers could easily double or triple.
Ranchers invest a great deal of time, care, and resources to protect their livestock. M-44s and Livestock Protection Collars are important tools in guarding their animals from predators.
There are significant restrictions in place to prevent threatened or endangered species from exposure to M-44s and LPCs. EPA stated that M-44s and LPCs do not pose a significant risk to non-target wildlife and there is no substantive reason to ban registration and use of these predator control methods.
In addition to protecting livestock, these predator control methods aid public safety, combat the spread of disease and reduce wildlife conflict while creating a sustainable balance between people and wildlife.
MONSANTO ON THE MARCH
BLOOMBERG:
By Jeremy van Loon
Feb. 18 (Bloomberg) -- Monsanto Co., the world’s largest seed producer, is asking that Germany’s agriculture ministry consider “scientific facts” rather than politics regarding possible restrictions of genetically altered corn.
“We hope that politics stays out of this decision,” Andreas Thierfelder, a spokesman for the St. Louis-based seed developer, said today in an interview. “There are no scientific reasons for a ban.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=a5HnvbyYSjx4&refer=germany
ST. LOUIS BIZJOURNAL:
Monsanto to grow seed segment by 60%
"The segment will maintain an 18 percent compound annual growth rate in its gross profit through fiscal 2012 while gross profit from Monsanto’s Roundup and herbicides business will decline after reaching a peak in fiscal 2009 at $2.4 billion to $2.5 billion in gross profit and drop to $1.9 billion in fiscal 2012, Casale was expected to tell investors at the Morgan Stanley Global Basic Materials Conference in New York."
http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2009/02/16/daily33.html
CNNMONEY.COM:
UPDATE:Monsanto Building China R&D Center;Eyes Asia,Americas
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200902180310DOWJONESDJONLINE000367_FORTUNE5.htm
OPEDNEWS.COM
Vilsack, Monsanto, and what that ham sandwich really costs.
"The bills in Congress that will industrialize of all farming and be the death of organic food are not identical, as I'd been told. They are each different and each bad in its own special way and they are still coming. SB 425, HB 875, HB 814, and now Dingel's, HB 759 which I just heard may win the prize for the worst (but the competition is stiff so who knows).
NEW WOLF LOVERS WEBSITE
Posted: Feb 12, 2009 03:14 PM MST Updated: Feb 12, 2009 04:42 PM MST Seventeen western environmental groups have launched a new Web site that they say delivers "just the facts" about wolves. The Western Wolf Coalition, comprised of 17 conservation and wildlife organizations, launched WesternWolves.org Thursday. The Web site features data and reports from wildlife agencies in the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, top wolf biologists, and news sources from around the region to dispel myths about wolves in the northern Rockies. Visitors to the site can learn about the natural history, biology, and pack structure of wolves, according to a news release. The site also provides data compiled about depredation rates on livestock, assesses the impacts of wolves on hunting in the region, and discusses methods available to livestock producers to reduce conflict with wolves. The coalition of conservation groups behind WesternWolves.org has also launched a public information campaign, using newspaper, radio, and banner ads in select western communities. These ads began running in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming this week. The groups, which have advocated on behalf of wolves for years, say they hope the new site helps dispell myths about what they are calling the most misunderstood of all species in the region. "Learning to live with wolves begins by understanding them," said Melanie Stein, a Sierra Club representative in Wyoming. "We believe this website will be a valuable resource for westerners who want science-based information about wolves in order to make up their own minds about how the species should be managed." Jason Camp of Belgrade, speaking for the Montana Stockgrowers Association, said ranchers think good science based information about wolves is a great idea, so long as it's presented in a fair, unbiased manner. He said he plans to check out the new site. The Western Wolf Coalition organizations include Conservation Northwest, Defenders of Wildlife, Endangered Species Coalition, Friends of the Clearwater, Idaho Conservation League, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Keystone Conservation, National Parks Conservation Association, Oregon Wild, Selkirk Conservation Alliance, Sierra Club, Western Watersheds Project, Western Wildlife Conservancy, Wolf Education and Research Center, Wolf Recovery Foundation and the Wyoming Outdoor Council.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Border Fences? Or Vehicle Ramps into the U.S.?
American Patrol Report -- February 21
Fencing and vehicle barriers along New Mexico/ Mexico border -- See larger photo... The Associated Press reports that, "U.S. Border Patrol agents shot a suspected drug smuggler in the New Mexico desert after the man ran over an officer with a pickup truck, officials said Friday." The AP reported that the shooting took place on a desert road 25 miles west of the Santa Teresa border crossing. They also report that Doug Mosier, a Border Patrol spokesman, "said it was unclear exactly where the driver crossed since the area has about 48 miles of vehicle and pedestrian fencing." According to American Border Patrol, there are 90 miles of continuous fencing and vehicle barriers along the New Mexico / Mexico border, not 48 miles.
Click title to see photo of vehicle barrier and read complete commentary.
TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD ON HIGH ALERT
Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 12:58 PM
|
Friday, February 20, 2009
BRAZILIAN BEEF JBS DEAL WITH NATIONAL BEEF DROPPED
Title click to read article in the DENVER POST.
Attorneys general for at least 13 states joined the suit, many of them from the central part of the U.S. and the west with meatpacking ties."
DESIGNER GOWNS COME HOME TO USA FROM ONCE MADE IN CHINA
Title click to read article in FORBES.
OVERHAUL OF USDA'S BIOTECHNOLOGY REGS STALLED
Title click to read article by UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Update on AZ Rancher Sued by 16 Illegal Aliens
Here's the update to the story about the AZ rancher who was sued by 16 illegals when he detained them for trespassing until the border patrol arrived.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...xicans-rights/
Jury: Rancher did not violate Mexicans' rights
A federal jury on Tuesday afternoon ruled that an Arizona rancher did not violate the civil rights of 16 Mexican nationals he detained at gunpoint after they had snuck illegally into the United States in 2004, but the jury awarded $78,000 in actual and punitive damages to six of the illegal immigrants on claims of assault and infliction of emotional distress.
After a nine-day trial, the eight-person jury -- four men and four women -- returned the verdict in U.S. District Court in Tucson, Ariz., after a day and a half of deliberation, also tossing charges of false imprisonment, battery and conspiracy against Douglas, Ariz., rancher Roger Barnett. Most of the award, about $60,000, was for punitive damages.
Mr. Barnett's attorney, David T. Hardy of Tucson , described the decision as an "80 percent victory," adding that he wished he and his client "would have gotten the other 20 percent." But he said he would appeal the decision, citing what he called "solid grounds." He also said U.S. District Judge John M. Roll had been "scrupulously fair" during the landmark trial.
Mr. Barnett owns the Cross Rail Ranch near Douglas , Ariz. , where he maintains cattle on 22,000 acres of private and leased land. A $32 million lawsuit, brought by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), sought damages for civil rights violations and the infliction of emotional distress. It also accuses Mr. Barnett of assault, battery and false imprisonment.
Also named were Mr. Barnett's wife, Barbara, and his brother, Donald, although the jury dismissed the allegations against both the wife and the brother.
The trial was based on a March 7, 2004 , incident in which Mr. Barnett approached a group of illegal immigrants while carrying a gun and accompanied by his dog.
Thanks to Radar for sending this our way.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Had Enough Yet? States Have Passed Laws to Prohibit Federal Encroachment
This map shows a growing number of states that have passed and propose
resolutions to assert the Tenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights of the
Constitution.
States with bills or resolutions:
Washington
New
Hampshire
Arizona
Montana
Michigan
Missouri
Oklahoma
California
Georgia
Monday, February 16, 2009
Amnesty, the Next Stench from DC?
Click the title for a preview of the smell of the death of the United States wafting from D.C. Time to start calling and writing again. We did it once but this will be an uphill battle. Thanks Luther.
Be sure to read the next post on Phoenix's status as second most kidnaps in the world.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Mexican drug cartels make Phoenix #2 in world for kidnappings
“We’re in the eye of the storm,” Phoenix Police Chief Andy Anderson told ABC News of the violent crimes and ruthless tactics spurred by Mexico’s drug cartels that have expanded business across the border. “If it doesn’t stop here, if we’re not able to fix it here and get it turned around, it will go across the nation,” he said.
Click title for full story which includes sources and videos.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Hope and Change in Action
Photo courtesy of FT.com: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9ebea1b8-f794-11dd-81f7-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
A Must Read If You Like Organic or Locally Produced Food
Click title.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Fourth Branch of Gov't, Bureaucracy, Has Control of Earmark-Free Stimulus Bill
Okay, I admit it. I really wasn't sure what an earmark was especially when I heard our president say last night at his first press conference that the stimulus bill contained no earmarks. I looked up earmarks in the dictionary. That confused me even more. Then I got curious and did my "googling". The following was right near the top of the list. So, now I understand and I hate to be lied to.
Earmark-Free Stimulus Bill Lacks Spending Direction
by Andrea Seabrook
Listen Now add to playlist
Morning Edition, February 6, 2009 · When congressional leaders began to assemble the mammoth economic stimulus bill, top Democrats and the Obama administration decided that there would be no earmarks: no "special projects," no pork-barrel spending. In so doing, they gave up some control over how the money is spent, leaving the decision to public servants around the country.
Click title to access complete article and podcast of NPR program 2/6/09.
Two Bills in Legislature Regarding Spaceport America
Click on title to read Heath Haussamen's story of 2/10/09. The house bill (HB 200) is about an exemption from Inspection of Public Records Act. The senate bill (SB 37) would provide protection for companies doing business at Spaceport America from civil lawsuits. Haussamen provides link to the Albuquerque Journal story
Mr. Landeene said at the Alamogordo meeting of the authority that the legislature needed to address the name change from Southwest Regional Spaceport and request more money. We will keep an eye out for those bills as well.
"Stimulus" Tells Grandpa and Grandma Get Out of the Way and Die
(Tax cheat) "Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them."
Outrageous provisions for National Health Care in "stimulus". Title click.
Another One for Confirmation. Tax Cheat or Even Worse? Not to Worry, He Likes to Fish
The White House “is the place where he ought to be right now, trying to save the world,” said Paul Ehrlich, author of “The Population Bomb” (Ballantine, 1968), a manifesto that predicted disaster from depletion of the Earth’s resources. Holdren is “absolutely brilliant,” Ehrlich said.
Saturday, February 7, 2009
The Nuts and Bolts Of Stimulation
Friday, February 6, 2009
WASHINGTON STATE HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL
Kathleen from Montana sent this to ORF. Thanks Kathleen.
WASHINGTON STATE HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL
H-1028.1
HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL 4009
State of Washington 61st Legislature 2009 Regular Session
By Representatives Shea, Klippert, Condotta, Kretz, Anderson, McCune, and Kristiansen
Read first time 01/30/09. Referred to Committee on State Government &Tribal Affairs.
1 TO THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND
2 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF
3 REPRESENTATIVES, AND TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
4 UNITED STATES, IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED, AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE
5 SENATE AND SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF EACH STATE'S
6 LEGISLATURE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
7 We, your Memorialists, the Senate and House of Representatives of
8 the State of Washington, in legislative session assembled, respectfully
9 represent and petition as follows:
10 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
11 States specifically provides that, "The powers not delegated to the
12 United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
13 are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and
14 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal
15 power as being those powers specifically granted to it by the
16 Constitution of the United States and no more; and
17 WHEREAS, Federalism is the constitutional division of powers
18 between the national and state governments and is widely regarded as
19 one of America's most valuable contributions to political science; andp. 1 HJM 4009
1 WHEREAS, James Madison, "the father of the Constitution," said,
2 "The powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined.
3 Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and
4 indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external
5 objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. The
6 powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects
7 which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties,
8 and properties of the people."; and
9 WHEREAS, Thomas Jefferson emphasized that the states are not
10 "subordinate" to the national government, but rather the two are
11 "coordinate departments of one simple and integral whole. The one is
12 the domestic, the other the foreign branch of the same government.";
13 and
14 WHEREAS, Alexander Hamilton expressed his hope that "the people
15 will always take care to preserve the constitutional equilibrium
16 between the general and the state governments." He believed that "this
17 balance between the national and state governments forms a double
18 security to the people. If one [government] encroaches on their
19 rights, they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed,
20 they will both be prevented from overpassing their constitutional
21 limits by [the] certain rivalship which will ever subsist between
22 them."; and
23 WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means
24 that the federal government was created by the states specifically to
25 be limited in its powers relative to those of the various states; and
26 WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as
27 agents of the federal government; and
28 WHEREAS, Many federal mandates are directly in violation of the
29 Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
30 WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v.
31 United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply
32 commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and
33 WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and
34 some now being considered by the present administration and from
35 Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States;
36 NOW, THEREFORE, Your Memorialists respectfully resolve:
37 (1) That the State of Washington hereby claims sovereignty underHJM 4009 p. 2
1 the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all
2 powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government
3 by the Constitution of the United States; and
4 (2) That this serve as a Notice and Demand to the federal
5 government to maintain the balance of powers where the Constitution of
6 the United States established it and to cease and desist, effective
7 immediately, any and all mandates that are beyond the scope of its
8 constitutionally delegated powers.
9 BE IT RESOLVED, That copies of this Memorial be immediately
10 transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United
11 States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the
12 House of Representatives, the President of the Senate and the Speaker
13 of the House of Representatives of each state's legislature of the
14 United States of America, and each member of Congress from the State of
15 Washington.
END
STATE OF WASHINGTON hOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL 4009/ http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009-10/Pdf/Bills/House%20Joint%20Memorials/4009-State%20sovereignty.pdf
OBAMA THREATENS LOS ALAMOS: DEPT OF ENERGY TRANSFER TO DEPT. OF DEFENSE; BINGHAM WILL FIGHT AGAINST
Title click. From Global Security Newswire.
"New Mexico Senator Jeff Bingaman (D), chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, criticized the potential move. The laboratories, two of which are in New Mexico, are not restricted to defense research and would be impaired by the shift, he argued.
"This is a very shortsighted approach, and I will fight it tooth and nail if they intend to proceed with it," he said in a statement."
DAVID HARSANYI: LENNON OR LENIN, IT STINKS
Title click. From today's Denver Post. Great opinion piece by David Harsanyi.
"Now, admittedly, Cramer can be a tad bit hyperbolic. And though we didn't hear Vladimir Ilyich, we are hearing the creeping sound of centralized Western European top-down economics — a system, where even with all the glorious over-regulations, there is a deep recession. "
"What could be more irresponsible than doubling the generational debt for your partisan pet projects in a time of crisis? "
Thursday, February 5, 2009
HR 45: BLAIR HOLT GUN LICENSING ACT:
ORF ALERT!
Contact your elected officials and tell them to vote NO on HR 45!
Take some time to read this bill. ORF has a post, below (scroll down), on this gun rights abolition bill.
Link to NRA Legislative Action on HR 45.
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=4329
IN THE ERA OF OBAMA: SEMANTICS AND OPEN BORDERS
Mexican tycoon, Carlos Slim, put $250M of his own money into the New York Times. Click on the link to read the story below.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/new-york-times-markets-equity-cx_mp_0119markets13.html
Consequently the NY Times published an exercise in semantics in an op-ed labeling an Asian/Jewish man opposing open borders, Marcos Epstein, as a 'nativist' and a 'white supremacist'.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/opinion/01sun1.html
Coincidence?
Thanks to the Peter Boyles Show/KHOW.AM talk show for this little gem.
Another "Stellar" Nominee? Is This Pathetic. Get On The Phone. You Know The Drill.
AP Photo
The Senate confirmation hearing for Leon Panetta,
nominated to be director of the CIA, is scheduled for Thursday.
WASHINGTON -- The White House's nominee for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon Panetta, has earned more than $700,000 in speaking and consulting fees since the beginning of 2008, with some of the payments coming from troubled financial firms and from a firm that invests in contractors for federal national security agencies, according to financial disclosures released Wednesday.
VICTIMS OF ILLEGAL SUE SANCTUARY CITY
Title click. Heard on the Peter Boyles KHOW.AM 02/04/09.
""However, despite these numerous arrests and the readily ascertainable illegal-immigrant status of Mr. Hernandez, at no time were proper procedures relating to the reporting, detention and handling of illegal immigrants followed by the law-enforcement agencies of the city of Denver," the claim states."
FROM LIBERTY MATTERS NEWS SERVICE: JOHN RAPANOS 'FINAL CHAPTER'
Click on the docs.google link to read the entire article.
"The story of John Rapanos’ fight against the federal government has come to a close. After 14 years of court battles and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent defending himself from the federal government, Mr. Rapanos agreed to end the persecution by paying the government nearly $1 million in fines and mitigation fees. The Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency accused Rapanos of polluting “waters of the U.S.” by spreading sand on his property twenty miles from the nearest navigable waterway. When Rapanos told them to “take a hike” they retaliated at his lack of respect for their omnipotence and sued him, criminally and civilly. One judge remarked during one of the many trials that his “crime” appeared to be “moving sand from one end of his property to another.”
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=ddwqvm8g_174fwg3chdt&hl=en
Thanks to Raven Webb from the Wahkiakum County Resistence Forum for providing ORF with this information.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
New Hampshire talks Civil War against feds!
This act by New Hampshire is a clear warning to the federal government that they could face being stripped of their power by the States (presumably through civil war!
The remarkable document outlines with perfect clarity, some basics long forgotten. For instance, it reminds Congress "That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever;. . . . . therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force;"
Federal gun crime laws? Void. Federal drug crime laws? Void. The gazzillion other federal criminal laws that deal with anything other than the specific enumerated crimes? ALL VOID.
One would think that if any lawyer anywhere in the entire country was worth his salt, all federal criminal trials would have ended years ago. This seems to prove that most lawyers are dullards.
New Hampshire deals a complete death blow to the pending federal hate crimes legislation by pointing out "That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; . . . . ."
Later in the Resolution, New Hampshire makes clear what the feds are now risking if they proceed further: The removal of all powers from the federal government by the States!
Quoting directly from the Resolution: "That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:
I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.
II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.
III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.
IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.
V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.
VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and
That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually."
I have reported on this blog for quite some time that we here in the United States are heading toward Civil War. Many of you told me I was a nut for thinking that.
The simple fact is that we are long overdue for another Rebellion in this nation and I heartily endorse the idea of having one again very soon; preferably starting THIS year!
We must stop our federal government dead in its tracks because it is out of control and very dangerous. If stopping them means attacking them and destroying them by force, then so be it.
Posted on ORF by Karan Berry
Read the full New Hampshire Resolution directly from the State Government Web Site, Here
Stimulated
*MADAME PELOSI*
Madame Pelosi wasn't happy with the small private jet that comes with the Speaker's job...no, Madame Pelosi was aggravated that this little jet had to stop to refuel, so she ordered a Big Fat 200 seat jet that could get her back to California without stopping!
She flies home to California , cost to the taxpayers of about $60,000, one way!
Folks, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to the taxpayers of $5,760,000.
Madame Pelosi wants you and me to conserve our carbon footprint. She wants us to buy smaller cars and Obama wants us to get a bicycle pump and air up our tires.
Keep in mind the figures above, do NOT include cost of
plane or crew, Just fuel!
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
The Lines Are Jammed But Keep Trying
Continue to Call Senators Bingaman and Udall:
800-828-0498 and 202-224-3121
Tell them Daschle needs to hit the road.
Tell them the "Stimulus" Bill is pork on steriods.
Tell them you will be watching their votes and it will be political hara kiri to vote "yes" on either of these. Even the Washington Post is turning on corruption of this scale.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_hari_kari
Monday, February 2, 2009
Action Needed Today - Get Off the Ledge and Fight Back

The most important phone call you make today should be to Santa Fe. Please take the time this morning to call Democrat State Senator Bernadette Sanchez of Albuquerque and encourage her to vote "NO" on Senate Bill 12 in today's Senate Judiciary committee meeting.
Please take the time this morning to stand up for what you believe in. Please call Senator Bernadette Sanchez and encourage a "NO" vote on Senate Bill 12. Her vote will kill this bill.
State Senator Bernadette Sanchez 505-986-4267
State Senator Richard Martinez 505-986-4389
Thank you,
Bob Cornelius





